Brako-Powers Heads to Supreme Court Over Kotoka Airport Renaming Illegalities
Debate Intensifies Over Proposed Renaming of Kotoka International Airport
A growing public and legal debate has emerged over the proposed renaming of Kotoka International Airport, with legal experts and policy commentators divided on the process and justification behind the move. Speaking on the issue, Austin Brako-Powers stressed the importance of due process and adherence to the law, warning against setting dangerous precedents. According to him, decisions of national importance—especially those tied to public institutions—must be guided by proper legal frameworks and broad public consensus. He explained that the controversy stems from a petition that prompted the President to initiate discussions on changing the airport’s name.
However, critics argue that the procedure followed may not align with established legal requirements. Brako-Powers noted that if the Supreme Court of Ghana rules on the matter, the outcome could restore the airport’s original legal status, requiring it to remain “Kotoka International Airport” until any lawful amendments are made. He further emphasized that any informal or unofficial references to a new name should cease immediately, insisting that the airport must continue to be recognized by its legally established name until Parliament properly amends the law.
Adding to the discussion, Ako Gunn defended the intentions behind the proposed change, arguing that it is part of a broader effort to promote Ghana internationally. He maintained that, from the perspective of policymakers such as the Transport Ministry, due process had been followed.
Godwin Ako Gunn defends the government’s intention to rename Kotoka
According to him, associating the airport more directly with Accra could strengthen the country’s global branding, particularly during international events and conferences. However, legal scholar Kwame Prempeh strongly disagreed with the rationale. He described the renaming exercise as unnecessary and a potential waste of public funds. Drawing comparisons with major global airports such as Charles de Gaulle Airport, Prempeh argued that airports worldwide are often named after prominent figures rather than cities, without affecting their visibility or importance.
Mr. Kwame Prempeh sees it as a waste of money
Kwame Prempeh further pointed out that airport codes, such as Accra’s “ACC,” already serve as global identifiers, making the argument for increased visibility through renaming weak. In his view, resources would be better spent on improving infrastructure and services rather than altering established names. The debate also touched on broader concerns about governance and legal consistency. Brako-Powers cautioned that bypassing proper legislative procedures, even for seemingly minor changes, could create precedents that might be exploited in more significant matters in the future. As discussions continue, many observers believe the final decision may ultimately rest with the courts or Parliament. Until then, the controversy highlights the delicate balance between national branding, legal procedure, and the responsible use of public resources.
